首页> 外文OA文献 >How good are Bayesian belief networks for environmental management? A test with data from an agricultural river catchment
【2h】

How good are Bayesian belief networks for environmental management? A test with data from an agricultural river catchment

机译:贝叶斯信念网络在环境管理方面的表现如何?用农业河流流域的数据进行测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

1. The ecological health of rivers worldwide continues to decline despite increasing effort and investment in river science and management. Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) are increasingly being used as a mechanism for decision-making in river management because they provide a simple visual framework to explore different management scenarios for the multiple stressors that impact rivers. However, most applications of BBN modelling to resource management use expert knowledge and/or limited real data, and fail to accurately assess the ability of the model to make predictions. 2. We developed a BBN to model ecological condition in a New Zealand river using field/GIS data (from multiple rivers), rather than expert opinion, and assessed its predictive ability on an independent dataset. The developed BBN performed moderately better than a number of other modelling techniques (e.g., artificial neural networks, classification trees, random forest, logistic regression), although model construction was more time3consuming. Thus the predictive ability of BBNs is (in this case at least) on a par with other modelling methods but the approach is distinctly better for its ability to visually present the data linkages, issues and potential outcomes of management options in real time. 3. The BBN suggested management of habitat quality, su ch as riparian planting, along with the current management focus on limiting nutrient leaching from agricultural land may be most effective in improving ecological condition. 4. BBNs can be a powerful and accurate method of effectively portraying the multiple interacting drivers of environmental condition in an easily understood manner. However, most BBN applications fail to appropriately test the model fit prior to use. We believe this lack of testing may seriously undermine their long-term effectiveness in resource management, and recommend that BBNs should be used in conjunction with some measure of uncertainty about model predictions. We have demonstrated this for a BBN of ecological condition in a New Zealand river, shown that model fit is better than that for other modelling techniques, and that improving habitat would be equally effective to reducing nutrients to improve ecological condition.
机译:1.尽管加大了对河流科学和管理的投入和投入,但世界范围内河流的生态健康状况仍在继续下降。贝叶斯信念网络(BBNs)被越来越多地用作河流管理决策的机制,因为它们提供了一个简单的可视框架来探讨影响河流的多种压力源的不同管理方案。但是,BBN建模在资源管理中的大多数应用使用专家知识和/或有限的真实数据,并且无法准确地评估模型进行预测的能力。 2.我们开发了一个BBN模型(使用多条河流的现场/ GIS数据而不是专家意见)来模拟新西兰河流中的生态状况,并在独立的数据集上评估了其预测能力。发达的BBN的性能比许多其他建模技术(例如,人工神经网络,分类树,随机森林,逻辑回归)的性能要好一些,尽管模型构建会花费更多时间。因此,BBN的预测能力(至少在这种情况下)可与其他建模方法相提并论,但该方法的可视化实时呈现数据联系,问题和潜在管理方案的能力明显更好。 3. BBN建议对栖息地质量进行管理,例如作为河岸种植,以及目前的管理重点是限制从农田中浸出的养分,这可能最有效地改善了生态状况。 4. BBN可以是一种功能强大且准确的方法,以一种易于理解的方式有效地描绘环境条件的多个相互作用驱动因素。但是,大多数BBN应用程序在使用前都无法正确测试模型的拟合度。我们认为缺乏测试可能会严重破坏其在资源管理方面的长期有效性,因此建议将BBN与模型预测的不确定性结合使用。我们已经针对新西兰河中的BBN生态状况证明了这一点,表明模型拟合优于其他建模技术,并且改善栖息地对减少营养物改善生态状况同样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号